Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I was poking around my Comcast bill and found that I have a limit on my bandwidth. It's set at 250GB a month, for both upload and download combined. What a bummer. We're on day 8 of the month and I've used 60GB.

Comcast @ $59.95 + $7 modem fee (Greeley, CO)
Downloads up to 6Mbps, uploads up to 1Mbps.
Monthly total, $69.97

Time Warner @ 44.95 no modem fee (Green Bay, WI)
Downloads up to 7Mbps, uploads up to 512 Kbps
Monthly total, $49.??

I suppose one would chalk this up to the higher cost of living in CO over WI.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Used a Best Buy gift card to get a modem to eliminate that damn $7 charge.

Ubee U10C018
11.7 Mbps download, 3.20 Mbps upload

Zoom 5241
11.04 Mbps download, 3.97 Mbps upload


I can't recall downloading anything more than 2Mbps so I guess the upload and lack of modem fee balances things out for me.

@$7.00/month I've given Comcast $70, which covered the cost of the new modem, easily. In other words, wish I'd have done this from the start.


The steps are very easy.
http://www.ehow.com/how_5313557_change-modem-comcast.html 
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.

The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.

How many people actually need or truly benefit from having internet at their fingertips wherever they go? I would venture to guess less than 1% of users. It is just one more way to keep people submerged in a cyberuniverse instead of interacting with real people around them.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
We dumped Comcast last week. Well technically we still have them until the 18th of the month but don't use them. Lower price was only one of the reasons. The main one was that Comcast kept dropping service. Sometimes it was 10 times in a day. Sometimes it was only for a minute other times for more than an hour. Terribly frustrating. When we called them to see what the problem was they acted like they never heard of the issue before. I know it has been a problem for a long time as my brother has their service in another town 5 miles from me he is always calling my office asking us to do a change for a client as his office internet was down.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago


Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.



The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.



How many people actually need or truly benefit from having internet at their fingertips wherever they go? I would venture to guess less than 1% of users. It is just one more way to keep people submerged in a cyberuniverse instead of interacting with real people around them.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



 



 



I have been saying this for a long time.  Why an 18 yr old needs all that is beyond me.  And yet everyone seems to get sucked up into that.  I love being at the mall and when my wife goes into a store I will stand next to one of the wireless phone kiosks.  They kids they try to explain to me the wonders of their phones.  I just laugh and say that we as a people simply don't need them.  They all argue how wonderful it is.  I just laugh at them and tell them I have my own office and I don't need it.  Why does a kid who is going to dinner and a movie need it.  They are a little stunned and some of them sheepishly agree it is more of a luxury than a necessity.



UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.

The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Is that really the primary problem, though? I mean, I can understand smartphones increasing traffic... but I find it pretty difficult to believe that smartphones have increased traffic to the point of requiring bandwidth caps, which every company now claims is a necessity.

Frankly, I think the bigger problem is that all internet companies are affiliated with cable-television. Therein lies the problem... television is being phased out and the preferred medium of choice is becoming online on-demand services (like Netflix, youtube, etc.).

That is a big blow to companies who have invested millions in television infrastructure, rights fees, etc. As a way to continue to make enough previous levels of profit from their investments, companies like Time Warner, Comcast, Rogers and Bell (both in Canada) start setting unfair restrictions with the hope that people cut down on their on-demand online viewing, and return to watching television.

Frankly, the claims by companies with a stake in having people buy and use cable t.v. are starting to get pathetic. It is sad that companies, in response to development and progression, are resorting to restrictions on the fruits of the progression just to protect their behinds. I personally prefer to go through independently owned companies that buy bandwidth from the major players via wholesale, and then retail that at a cheaper rate with much looser bandwidth caps.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

Is that really the primary problem, though? I mean, I can understand smartphones increasing traffic... but I find it pretty difficult to believe that smartphones have increased traffic to the point of requiring bandwidth caps, which every company now claims is a necessity.

Frankly, I think the bigger problem is that all internet companies are affiliated with cable-television. Therein lies the problem... television is being phased out and the preferred medium of choice is becoming online on-demand services (like Netflix, youtube, etc.).

That is a big blow to companies who have invested millions in television infrastructure, rights fees, etc. As a way to continue to make enough previous levels of profit from their investments, companies like Time Warner, Comcast, Rogers and Bell (both in Canada) start setting unfair restrictions with the hope that people cut down on their on-demand online viewing, and return to watching television.

Frankly, the claims by companies with a stake in having people buy and use cable t.v. are starting to get pathetic. It is sad that companies, in response to development and progression, are resorting to restrictions on the fruits of the progression just to protect their behinds. I personally prefer to go through independently owned companies that buy bandwidth from the major players via wholesale, and then retail that at a cheaper rate with much looser bandwidth caps.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



Not to mention that cable companies, being government-protected monopolies in virtually every municipality, are the poster children for putridly bad customer service.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
HTC Evo 4G on Sprint 4G (Good)

download 5.9 Mbps
upload 929 kbps
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

being government-protected monopolies in virtually every municipality

Originally Posted by: Wade 



So that's the case in the US, too, eh?

Shake. My. Head.

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I have two outlets, one in the living room, one in the master room.

Living Room
Download: 14Mbps
Upload: 3.4Mbps


Master Room
Download: 2.90Mbps
Upload: 4.01Mbps



WTF??>?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3h) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (3h) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (3h) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (4h) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (4h) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (6h) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (6h) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (8h) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (10h) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (11h) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (11h) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.