Now there are arguments that could be made that Brady is as good as Aaron. They're be wrong, of course, but arguments can be made.
Originally Posted by: zombieslayer
Okay, I'll try -- over the last three seasons in which he played (an admittedly arbitrary point of reference I suppose; also, I'm leaving out his 2008 injury season) Tom Brady has:
-114 TDs to 25 INT
-13,104 yards (averaging almost 4,400 yards a season)
-completed 66.9% of passes
-has a 40-8 regular season record
-has put together two of the three most absurd seasons for a QB, ever. In 2007 threw for 4,800 yards, 50 TDs to 8 INTs. In 2010 threw 36 TDs to a ridiculous 4 INT (astonishing .8 INT percentage)
Now, that's just a shallow look at the numbers.
I'd argue that Rodgers physical skill set is at this point beyond Brady. Rodgers has better arm velocity and arguably better accuracy. He's also much more mobile.
Don't get me wrong, Rodgers is my boy through and through (and I despise New England). But it's pretty hard to dethrone Brady as the best in the game.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."