warhawk
15 years ago
Ya, the Vikings were good enough against Baltimore to stand there and watch the winning fg go wide after the Ravens scored 28 second half points.

I am not exactly sure that qualifies under the old "good teams find a way to win" column. More like "we're lucky as crap to get out of that with a win" maybe.

Piss poor defense will lose football games and yes, your right, most of the time the Vikings, the Packers, or anybody else will not win those games.

Your right they are 6-1. All I'm saying is I wouldn't put no "world beater" emblem on their helmets based on the way they got there.
"The train is leaving the station."
Formo
15 years ago

Ya, the Vikings were good enough against Baltimore to stand there and watch the winning fg go wide after the Ravens scored 28 second half points.

I am not exactly sure that qualifies under the old "good teams find a way to win" column. More like "we're lucky as crap to get out of that with a win" maybe.

"warhawk" wrote:



Did you see the whole game, or did you only watch the missed FG? Like I told a fellow Viking fan, stop looking at 2 plays to judge the 'luckiness' of the Vikings 2 wins and instead look at 8 quarters (I'm talking about the W's against the Ravens and the 49ers). The Vikings were obviously good enough to beat the Ravens, judging by how badly the beat the piss out of them in the first 2 1/2 quarters. They also let up in the 4th, while the Ravens turn it on. And guess what? The Ravens lost. -=shock, awe=-

Piss poor defense will lose football games and yes, your right, most of the time the Vikings, the Packers, or anybody else will not win those games.

"warhawk" wrote:



Except there was only 2 quarters of piss poor defense on the Vikings behalf.

Your right they are 6-1. All I'm saying is I wouldn't put no "world beater" emblem on their helmets based on the way they got there.

"warhawk" wrote:



No one here has put any sort of world beater sticker on their helmets. And I'll be the last one to do as such. The fact still remains that they are 6-1. No what-ifs or anything of the sort.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Blitz
15 years ago
Why GB will beat the Vikings? Simple math:

UserPostedImage*
*PackerPalace procured.

BTW here's their latest comedy bit.
Click here: Favrehorn Vikehorn 
They've done better, but the beginning makes me laugh.
:joker:
"... There.. is.. your.. dagger..!! "
zombieslayer
15 years ago

Why GB will beat the Vikings? Simple math:

UserPostedImage*
*PackerPalace procured.

BTW here's their latest comedy bit.
Click here: Favrehorn Vikehorn 
They've done better, but the beginning makes me laugh.
:joker:

"Blitz" wrote:



That's just too funny.
+1
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Why GB will beat the Vikings? Simple math:

UserPostedImage*
*PackerPalace procured.

BTW here's their latest comedy bit.
Click here: Favrehorn Vikehorn 
They've done better, but the beginning makes me laugh.
:joker:

"zombieslayer" wrote:



That's just too funny.
+1

"Blitz" wrote:


Agreed. +1
UserPostedImage
Formo
15 years ago

Why GB will beat the Vikings? Simple math:

UserPostedImage*
*PackerPalace procured.

BTW here's their latest comedy bit.
Click here: Favrehorn Vikehorn 
They've done better, but the beginning makes me laugh.
:joker:

"wpr" wrote:



That's just too funny.
+1

"zombieslayer" wrote:


Agreed. +1

"Blitz" wrote:



Took me about 3 times seeing that to get the 4+4+4=12 thing. Haha!
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
longtimefan
15 years ago



Took me about 3 times seeing that to get the 4+4+4=12 thing. Haha!

"Formo" wrote:



Nahhhhhhhhh

I will pass on this lob
nerdmann
15 years ago

Ya, the Vikings were good enough against Baltimore to stand there and watch the winning fg go wide after the Ravens scored 28 second half points.

I am not exactly sure that qualifies under the old "good teams find a way to win" column. More like "we're lucky as crap to get out of that with a win" maybe.

"Formo" wrote:



Did you see the whole game, or did you only watch the missed FG? Like I told a fellow Viking fan, stop looking at 2 plays to judge the 'luckiness' of the Vikings 2 wins and instead look at 8 quarters (I'm talking about the W's against the Ravens and the 49ers). The Vikings were obviously good enough to beat the Ravens, judging by how badly the beat the piss out of them in the first 2 1/2 quarters. They also let up in the 4th, while the Ravens turn it on. And guess what? The Ravens lost. -=shock, awe=-

Piss poor defense will lose football games and yes, your right, most of the time the Vikings, the Packers, or anybody else will not win those games.

"warhawk" wrote:



Except there was only 2 quarters of piss poor defense on the Vikings behalf.

Your right they are 6-1. All I'm saying is I wouldn't put no "world beater" emblem on their helmets based on the way they got there.

"warhawk" wrote:



No one here has put any sort of world beater sticker on their helmets. And I'll be the last one to do as such. The fact still remains that they are 6-1. No what-ifs or anything of the sort.

"warhawk" wrote:




They are who we thought they were.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
15 years ago



Took me about 3 times seeing that to get the 4+4+4=12 thing. Haha!

"longtimefan" wrote:



Nahhhhhhhhh

I will pass on this lob

"Formo" wrote:



Good call. I was just ready to fire away and read your post. Better pass it is too easy.
UserPostedImage
LambeauEast
15 years ago
This one is gonna be HUGE, ladies and gentlemen! We will all be fortunate to have seen it!

As much as I had a "feeling" that the Queens would win #1, I have the EXACT feeling for the Pack on #2.

Keep in mind, I bought into the wonderful preseason the Pack had, and swore I would never be swayed again. Manhandling the Lions and Browns will not falsely sway me, but that said, this is a tad bit different Packer team than the one that played in the Metrodump 4 weeks ago.

I truly like our chances, and will not go against my prediction of Pack 38- Queens 24, but if the Queens come in and take it from us, I will totally buy into just how real they may be!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3h) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (3h) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (3h) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (4h) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (4h) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (6h) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (6h) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (8h) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (10h) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (11h) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (11h) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.