Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
By the way, the author of that article makes a truly terrifying statement in the comments section following:

I think Russell could be a good player, but he is too risky to take in the top 10. If he fell to the Panthers or the Packers that would be a more appropriate place for him.

"David Lewin" wrote:



Thank goodness he didn't!
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

By the way, the author of that article makes a truly terrifying statement in the comments section following:

I think Russell could be a good player, but he is too risky to take in the top 10. If he fell to the Panthers or the Packers that would be a more appropriate place for him.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Thank goodness he didn't!

"David Lewin" wrote:



No kidding! We would've missed out on Justin Harrell.

Thanks for the hot Russian chicks. I couldn't find them on that web page.
blank
peteralan71
14 years ago
I bet people were kicking themselves for not drafting Kurt Warner, Tom Brady, Dan Marino (1st round, but 27th pick, three later than Rodgers), etc. etc. etc.

There is a lot about the team and coaching that makes the player who they are too. A player can't go to every team and put up the exact same numbers.

Like Greg said, hindsight is 20/20.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

No kidding! We would've missed out on Justin Harrell.

"Greg C." wrote:



Thanks for the laugh, but I'm actually serious. Imagine what would have happened if the Packers had move into that season with Favre, Rodgers, and Russell on the roster. Imagine all the speculation about potential trades, etc. that we would have had to endure. Surely one or both of them would have been dangled as trade bait at some point, or we might not have had the inclination to draft Matt Flynn. Imagine all the furor from the Favre fellators. Then again, we might not have drafted Brian Brohm either, which probably wouldn't have been a bad thing.

Justin Harrell was certainly a bust, but there was no way he was going to have represented a threat to Rodgers in the way Russell could have (in this alternative universe, of course).

The babes are still there, by the way.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago
Yeah, drafting Russell would've created a weird situation, alright. I really don't think Ted would've done it, though. Even when Russell looked like he might be really good, he never looked like a West Coast Offense type of QB. Also, there would've been two first round draft picks as backup QBs--not a great thing for the salary structure.
blank
Felipe7777777
14 years ago
haha that would've have been terrible if the packers got him
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Also, there would've been two first round draft picks as backup QBs--not a great thing for the salary structure.

"Greg C." wrote:



True, although with the Packers picking 16th, the price would not have been astronomical. After being picked 24th in 2005, Aaron Rodger inked a rookie contract was worth only $7.7 million (up to $24.5 million with no doubt impossible-to-reach incentives), of which $5.4 million was guaranteed. His salary cap hit was minimal. Taken 16th a couple of years later, Justin Harrell signed a six-year contract worth around $15 million with approximately $8 million guaranteed. Russell no doubt would have commanded a quarterback premium, so it's probably not unreasonable to assume he would have received upwards of $10 million guaranteed. Again, not outlandish, but certainly not the most desirable of situations.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
14 years ago
To tell you the truth I think all these articles about 'so n so kicking themself for not drafting rodgers' are Dumb ...

Who knows if rodgers would of turned into the same person he is today if he didnt have MM and his QB coach and favre to model himself from ... or perhaps learn from his mistakes (INTs).

Stick him on another team that goes through coaches like a knife on hot butter ...

I do agree that rodgers has a great work eithic; but who knows a guy like that in a 'shitty' organization may have ended up frustrated and just down and out.

Put a guy like rodgers in a organization like the packers with great coaches and a great team/city/fan base and you have a great recipe.

so I might be going round robin here but ya perhaps those teams are kicking themselves for not drafting rodgers - but more then likely he would of not turned out the same under their tutelage.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Here's another article with a similar theme. The author makes the interesting point that it was not Mike McCarthy but Mike Nolan who made the decision to go with Smith over Rodgers, citing attitudinal incompatibility as his reason for passing on Rodgers.

Peterson: 49ers fans can play fantasy football over Aaron Rodgers vs. Alex Smith and Mike McCarthy vs. Mike Nolan 

By Gary Peterson
Bay Area News Group
Posted: 01/25/2011 10:05:09 PM PST
Updated: 01/26/2011 07:25:22 AM PST

[img_r]http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site568/2011/0123/20110123__ssjm0124nfc~3_VIEWER.JPG[/img_r]Count Mel Kiper Jr. among those who like to construct parallel universes in their spare time.

In a recent post on ESPN.com, Kiper revisited the 2005 NFL draft. That, of course, was the draft in which the 49ers, holding the first pick and needing a quarterback, selected Alex Smith instead of Aaron Rodgers.

As this is written, Smith has failed the 49ers nearly as badly as they have failed him. Rodgers and the Green Bay Packers are Super Bowl-bound. It's perfect fodder for the what-if parlor trick.

What if the 49ers had drafted Rodgers instead of Smith? "It could have been a perfect marriage," Kiper wrote.

Later, in reassessing the 2005 draft with 2011 hindsight, Kiper assigns Rodgers to San Francisco and writes: "He was right nearby in Berkeley, and he likely changes everything for the 49ers."

We're using Kiper's hypothesis as a jumping-off point here, but he's hardly the first to explore this alternative reality. And he won't be the last, not with the upcoming Super Bowl beginning to blot out the sun.

But here's the problem with the what-if game -- it lacks context. It suggests events that would never have happened. For example: What if Mel Kiper had celebrated his 30th birthday by getting a crew cut? It could have been a perfect marriage.

In the case of the first pick in the 2005 draft, Rodgers ceased to be an option for the 49ers the minute they hired Mike Nolan as coach. Nolan was no-nonsense, a strong personality who didn't like to be challenged. He met with Rodgers and Smith before the draft. He caught a whiff of attitude
from Rodgers, and that was that.

Smith was chosen based on personality. He is cerebral, introspective, with a distaste for confrontation. Nolan presumed, correctly, that Smith would be low-maintenance in meeting rooms and during sideline consultations.

On the field? He was a curious fit, coming from a college program (Utah) that utilized the spread offense almost exclusively. He also was known as a guy who performed better from inside a comfort zone. The 49ers, coming off a 2-14 season, were in no position to promise a comfortable working environment.

Rodgers played in a prostyle offense at Cal. He didn't mind getting his nose bloody. He had no problems speaking his mind. Being drafted by the Packers and forced to practice the fine art of patience behind Brett Favre were the best things that could have happened to him. Just as being thrown into a disorganized state of perpetual chaos was the worst thing that could have happened to Smith.

Switch them out, and what happens? Smith does better in Green Bay than he did in San Francisco, but not as well as Rodgers has done. Rodgers does better with the 49ers than Smith did, but nowhere near as well as he has done with the Packers. Neither, we can safely guess, goes anywhere near a Super Bowl without a paid admission.

If you want to play the what-if game with the 49ers and the 2005 draft, here's where you start: What if the Yorks had hired Mike McCarthy as coach instead of Nolan?

Nolan came recommended as an accomplished defensive coordinator, having worked in that capacity for 11 seasons with four NFL teams. He had a particular appeal to the 49ers, given that his father had coached the team for eight seasons. So they hired Nolan, who in turn hired McCarthy to run the offense.

But McCarthy also was an accomplished and experienced coordinator. In his
five years at New Orleans, the Saints finished in the top half of the league in yards gained every season, finished in the top 10 twice and ranked third in 2002. And this was with Jeff Blake and Aaron Brooks at quarterback.

Was McCarthy ready to be a head coach? The Packers thought so -- after McCarthy spent one season on Nolan's staff, the Pack came calling. In five short years McCarthy has become the fifth-winningest coach in team history (with the fourth-best winning percentage). If he beats Pittsburgh a week from Sunday, they'll name a street for him in Green Bay.

Had McCarthy been hired by the 49ers in 2005 and been given a strong voice in the draft, it's easy to imagine him picking Rodgers, ready-made for the pro game and itching to get going. This is the alternate reality in which things would have turned out differently for the 49ers.

To say nothing of the Packers -- and Mel Kiper's hairline.


UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago
The thing about Mike Nolan not liking Rodgers because of his attitude was also alluded to in that article by Ann Killion that I posted a few weeks ago. I thought it was very funny, the way she summarized it:

"The younger Smith was deemed more "coachable" and pliant by the 49ers--he was willing to do a series of oddball tasks like hop on one foot without questioning why Nolan was asking him to do so (note: pliant is not a good quality in quarterbacks). Rodgers, in contrast, was viewed as cocky (note: cocky is a good quality in quarterbacks)."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/ann_killion/01/18/aaron-rodgers/index.html#ixzz1DeY4x9Sy 
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (51m) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (1h) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10h) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10h) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10h) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (11h) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (11h) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (13h) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (13h) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (15h) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (17h) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (18h) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

6h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.