Porforis
13 years ago
Pick your poison:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/15/politics/immigration/index.html?hpt=hp_t1 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/15/obama-administration-to-offer-immunity-to-younger-immigrants/ 

Summary: The Obama Administration will stop deporting and issue work permits younger illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and have never committed a crime.

Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano said the change is needed to ensure enforcement resources are not expended on “low-priority cases” and are instead focused on people who “meet enforcement priorities.”

Personal Thoughts:
‎1. "Amnesty" to children of illegal immigrants: An idea not without its flaws but in my opinion, the best decision out of the available options (Including doing nothing)
2. Kind of scary that we live in a country where the government can knowingly assassinate an American citizen without a trial, and the executive branch can decide that they can simply issue directives that ignore current laws on the books. The ends do not justify the means, and everytime we trample over the constitution, it's that much easier the next time.
4PackGirl
13 years ago
i guess i want it both ways.
our country was founded by 'illegal immigrants', my grandfather's family had to endure prejudice because they were full blooded Italians aka WOP's (without papers), i could see the hurt in my grandpa's eyes whenever he talked about how others looked down on him based on nothing but his heritage. i guess i think everyone deserves a chance to follow the American dream.

what i don't fully understand is why people want to remain 'illegals'. i understand the tax benefits & such but other than that, why don't they become citizens legally? am i missing something? is it really difficult to become a citizen?
Porforis
13 years ago
It is very difficult to become a citizen, I guess what gets me is that rather than simply acknowledging that a majority of Americans voted for someone that disagrees with him on the other side of the isle, our president takes it upon himself to just say "Nope, if they don't want to push my immigration reform ideas I'm just going to decree that we stop enforcing the laws on the books". Regardless of if he has good intentions or not, this is a terrible, terrible precedent.
4PackGirl
13 years ago
ok so it's very difficult to become a citizen & yet people are screaming about illegal immigrants, how they're taking advantage of our country, our laws, taking our jobs, etc...

doesn't common sense say either make it a bit easier to become a citizen or put our troops side by side lined up on the border?? we can't have it both ways.

Zero2Cool
13 years ago
Whatever, all I ask is learn ENGLISH!
UserPostedImage
dhazer
13 years ago
It is not that hard to become a citizen, you can take the test and get 25 out of 100 wrong and still pass. The questions are not that hard, they have questions like what ocean is on the east coast of the US or what ocean is on the west coast. What day is Independence day?

The illegals don't want to become citizens because they don't have to pay taxes and they get all the benefits such as welfare and I have seen they have been treated better.

I say make a hunting season down on the southern border, call me racist all you want. But look what happens when an illegal gets busted here, they get food and a comfy cell and a ride home. Now in Mexico if we are in jail we get moldy bread and crappy water and hard to get out.

And as Zero said since when is spanish the national language. I am sure Cali or zombie can attest to this but I have seen schools out there that fly the mexican flag with the american flag. That is bullshit, and all of this mexican american or african american, those assholes can take that and shove it up there as. If they want to remember their heritage take your ass back to your country then. If your in america your an american.


I don't say I am an Irish american.


Obama = next hitler





Some test questions


1. What are the colors of our flag?

2. How many stars are there in our flag?

3. What color are the stars on our flag?

4. What do the stars on the flag mean?

5. How many stripes are there in the flag?

6. What color are the stripes?

7. What do the stripes on the flag mean?

8. How many states are there in the Union?

9. What is the 4th of July?

10. What is the date of Independence Day?


practice test citizenship 
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
porky88
13 years ago
Isn't Obama in favor of the dream act? Whether you think that's the ideal plan or not, that seems to be his position. What he announced today was not the dream act. This hyperpole reaction to anything a President or Governor (for that matter) makes is as damning to the country as anything politicians do. Frankly, politicians are the product of their environment. We create that environment with our reactions. The internet age hasn't helped. I do agree that the Presidential office is more powerful than what the founders intended. However, this isn't an Obama problem. The office he currently holds continues to receive more constitutional authority based on the decisions of courts. This dates well into the 20th century and both parties are guilty of it. You don't like that Obama has this authority? Blame the courts. They just keep giving the President more power.

Porforis
13 years ago

Isn't Obama in favor of the dream act? Whether you think that's the ideal plan or not, that seems to be his position. What he announced today was not the dream act. This hyperpole reaction to anything a President or Governor (for that matter) makes is as damning to the country as anything politicians do. Frankly, politicians are the product of their environment. We create that environment with our reactions. The internet age hasn't helped. I do agree that the Presidential office is more powerful than what the founders intended. However, this isn't an Obama problem. The office he currently holds continues to receive more constitutional authority based on the decisions of courts. This dates well into the 20th century and both parties are guilty of it. You don't like that Obama has this authority? Blame the courts. They just keep giving the President more power.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



The entire point is that he doesn't have the constitutional authority, and this isn't an isolated incident. The healthcare landscape is now a clusterfuck if any part of the healthcare bill gets repealed because it got rammed down our throats regardless of the Court's eventual rulings whatever they may be, and the industry needed to adapt. Now, tens to hundreds of thousands of people will be granted citizenship, contrary to established laws. If the court shoots this down, what are they going to do, deport everyone that took advantage of it? Either way, the President successfully bypasses congress and forces what he wants down America's throats.

The point is that when people decide that they are not bound by the constitution, it causes damage. There's room to whine about the courts, but not really on the subject of this administration and extraconstitutional actions, unless I'm missing something.
porky88
13 years ago

The entire point is that he doesn't have the constitutional authority, and this isn't an isolated incident. The healthcare landscape is now a clusterfuck if any part of the healthcare bill gets repealed because it got rammed down our throats regardless of the Court's eventual rulings whatever they may be, and the industry needed to adapt. Now, tens to hundreds of thousands of people will be granted citizenship, contrary to established laws. If the court shoots this down, what are they going to do, deport everyone that took advantage of it? Either way, the President successfully bypasses congress and forces what he wants down America's throats.

The point is that when people decide that they are not bound by the constitution, it causes damage. There's room to whine about the courts, but not really on the subject of this administration and extraconstitutional actions, unless I'm missing something.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 


Nobody rammed the health care bill down anyone’s throat. It was passed by a democratically elected congress and signed into law by the President of the United States. You may not agree with the law, but it wasn't rammed down our throats. They did what they thought was right. Being incompetent doesn't make you the next Hitler. It just makes you a bad President.

Bringing up health care raises an interesting point, though. If the mandate is ruled unconstitutional, the entire bill creates even more chaos. If you're worried about that, then vote straight Republican this November. They promise a complete repeal of the law. However, it'll take 60 votes in the senate to repeal it because somebody (Bernie Sanders?) will filibuster any attempt to repeal. The Republicans will need to pickup 12 seats in the Senate for that to happen. That's a stretch. As a result, President Romney (hypothetically) will have to use his executive powers to gut the rest of the bill. Romney is campaigning on this fact. He’ll be sidestepping congress to bypass much of the law. The very same thing Obama is doing right now because he can’t get congress to pass the dream act. Romney will have that power because the courts gave him it. The same goes for Obama, Bush, and so on. Every President since FDR (many before) has probably overstepped what the founders intended. Saying Obama is an isolated instance is simply not true.
Porforis
13 years ago

Nobody rammed the health care bill down anyone’s throat. It was passed by a democratically elected congress and signed into law by the President of the United States. You may not agree with the law, but it wasn't rammed down our throats. They did what they thought was right. Being incompetent doesn't make you the next Hitler. It just makes you a bad President.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



I should have chosen my words more carefully. When I said "rammed down our throat", I meant to say that the Democrats took advantage of a majority to pass a highly controversial bill that Americans were split pretty much 50-50 down the middle about, and still are. Now that we've had time to digest everything, a significant majority of Americans oppose the individual mandate. As I've been enjoying a few glasses of yummy rum, I'm not particularly eloquent at the moment so I cant sum everything up in a few words, but that's what I was going for.

Bringing up health care raises an interesting point, though. If the mandate is ruled unconstitutional, the entire bill creates even more chaos. If you're worried about that, then vote straight Republican this November. They promise a complete repeal of the law. However, it'll take 60 votes in the senate to repeal it because somebody (Bernie Sanders?) will filibuster any attempt to repeal. The Republicans will need to pickup 12 seats in the Senate for that to happen. That's a stretch. As a result, President Romney (hypothetically) will have to use his executive powers to gut the rest of the bill. Romney is campaigning on this fact. He’ll be sidestepping congress to bypass much of the law. The very same thing Obama is doing right now because he can’t get congress to pass the dream act. Romney will have that power because the courts gave him it. The same goes for Obama, Bush, and so on. Every President since FDR (many before) has probably overstepped what the founders intended. Saying Obama is an isolated instance is simply not true.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Overall, this is why I believe that when you're talking about major legislation, there should either be a very immediate need for said legislation and/or a decent majority of public approval. When you make sweeping changes like the healthcare bill and this latest issue, if facts come out later or public opinion otherwise swings against the legislation, we're stuck with the consequences. That's not to say that healthcare and health coverage aren't big issues in our country (more for some than others), but I believe government should be more careful when pushing such changes. This is about as not-careful as you can get, bypassing the legislature altogether on an issue americans are very much divided on. The great unifier my ass.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (2h) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (8h) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (9h) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (18h) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (18h) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (18h) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (18h) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (19h) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (21h) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (21h) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (23h) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Around The NFL / beast

2h / Fantasy Sports Talk / buckeyepackfan

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

14h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.