nathaniel
15 years ago



You must not see many movies.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Actually I do. Last big budget movie that was fantastic was Star Trek.

There are a lot of indie and foreign films every year that are quite good.

"Porforis" wrote:



I'm pretty much a movie snob too. The movies with the most hype are usually all looks and no substance. I watched Star Trek though with absolutely no expectations and was blown away. The only other Star Trek flick I really liked was Star Trek 4, because it was so damn funny and ridiculous. But the new one was great.
blank
zombieslayer
15 years ago



I'm pretty much a movie snob too. The movies with the most hype are usually all looks and no substance. I watched Star Trek though with absolutely no expectations and was blown away. The only other Star Trek flick I really liked was Star Trek 4, because it was so damn funny and ridiculous. But the new one was great.

"nathaniel" wrote:



Awesome. I couldn't stop laughing at the "too much LDS in the 60s" line.

Yeah, I'm a snob, the type of guy who enjoys movies like Funny Games, Happiness, Delicatessen, Y tu mam tambin, and a hundred other films that nobody's even heard of.

A big budget film has to have something else going for it for me to like it. Like Harry Potter 3 for instance. One of my all-time favorite movies but then again it was directed by Alfonso Cuarn, the only director in that series with any real talent. The current director should be waiting tables and nowhere near a movie camera. Plus all 3 Lord of the Rings movies were outstanding but then again Peter Jackson did Heavenly Creatures which I loved.

I also loved the very first Pirates of the Caribbean and that was because they let Johnny Depp do his own thing. Depp is probably hands down America's best actor.

James Cameron is overrated. He scored with T2 but that's the only movie he directed I really liked. Most are just overblown, overbudgeted, and overhyped crap, kind of like Spielberg and that fat guy who does Star Wars, both whom I hate. So I think I'll pass on Avatar. Like I said, if I wanted to be impressed by visuals, I'd hit a strip club.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
nathaniel
15 years ago



James Cameron is overrated. He scored with T2 but that's the only movie he directed I really liked. Most are just overblown, overbudgeted, and overhyped crap, kind of like Spielberg and that fat guy who does Star Wars, both whom I hate. So I think I'll pass on Avatar. Like I said, if I wanted to be impressed by visuals, I'd hit a strip club.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Thank you, thank you, thank you! T2 was a once in a lifetime flick that happened to work on every level for him. Abyss was a run of the mill space movie, all he did was change the setting to an ocean. Titanic, there aren't words to express how much I loathe that movie. To me there is a difference between a movie and a film. Eraserhead is a film. Funny Games is a film (an extremely f'ed up one, I might add). One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest is a film. Avatar is a movie. Transformers is a movie. Not that there isn't a valid place for movies. I'll begrudgingly admit that I will put on the Star Wars prequels when I want to watch something absolutely mindless but fun to look at. I have a great appreciation for special effects. My wife went to school for computer animation, and just knowing everything that goes on in making those effects gets my admiration. But there's a difference in using those effects to sell the movie and using those effects to enhance the story. Like Transformers. No one is going to see that because of the love story between Shia and Megan. They want to see huge robots turning into cars. My interest in the Star Wars prequels was more storyline than visuals, but they failed miserably.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
o_O I didn't like this person's movie, so I hate all there movies!
o_O I loved this movie, so that means I love all there movies!


Makes sense.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago


Thank you, thank you, thank you! T2 was a once in a lifetime flick that happened to work on every level for him. Abyss was a run of the mill space movie, all he did was change the setting to an ocean. Titanic, there aren't words to express how much I loathe that movie. To me there is a difference between a movie and a film. Eraserhead is a film. Funny Games is a film (an extremely f'ed up one, I might add). One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest is a film. Avatar is a movie. Transformers is a movie. Not that there isn't a valid place for movies. I'll begrudgingly admit that I will put on the Star Wars prequels when I want to watch something absolutely mindless but fun to look at. I have a great appreciation for special effects. My wife went to school for computer animation, and just knowing everything that goes on in making those effects gets my admiration. But there's a difference in using those effects to sell the movie and using those effects to enhance the story. Like Transformers. No one is going to see that because of the love story between Shia and Megan. They want to see huge robots turning into cars. My interest in the Star Wars prequels was more storyline than visuals, but they failed miserably.

"nathaniel" wrote:



Heh. Agreed with all your Cameron examples except I have to admit I liked Titanic. But that has more to do with having a thing for Kate Winslet. :cyclopsani:

I've seen Eraserhead twice but of Lynch, my fave movies are in this order - Mulholland Drive, Blue Velvet, Lost Highway.

Of the "movies" recently, I really liked "Up." But then again, it had "film" elements - like a damn good storyline and wonderful character development.

As for SW, yes, Lucas tried to get you to feel bad for Darth Vader. That's where he failed. The first prequel was unwatchable because of that stupid creature with the ears. That killed a pretty good performance by Liam Neeson, who I really like. The 2nd and the 3rd one had painful scenes between Natalie Portman and the guy who played Annakin. George Lucas probably hadn't had a romantic moment in 30 years and it shows.

If something is bad, I can't enjoy it. Non-snobs don't understand that. I can't turn my mind off and enjoy something. Like that last James Bond movie. That was horrible. Comedy is the exception. I found that movie with McLovin' hilarious because every time McLovin' was on the screen, I couldn't stop laughing.

So for me, it's comedy. For you it's special effects. I totally understand where you're coming from.

Star Trek was well done. Up was well done. Heck, almost everything Pixar ever made was well done. But that's because Pixar "gets it," making a big budget movie that still has film elements.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
nathaniel
15 years ago
Good Lord, we think alike! Neeson was the only actor that looked like he gave a damn about actually acting.

I'm a Pixar guy too. My wife got me into those. You get caught up in the story and forget you're watching something animated. I get flack all the time for watching Finding Nemo and Incredibles, but they're great.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
I think I fail. I never cared about Dreamworks or the director or anything like that. I just watch the movie and gather my opinion from that. I guess I was never one to bash Chevrolet because I owned a few bad Chevys either though. I've always given something new a chance.


I don't think I'll give this movie a chance though, I fear blue people. Smurfs, eeek!!
UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Zero.. you're a dick! LOL

I love cartoons. Pixar/Dreamworks.. I don't care. I tend to love them. Well, most of them. Robots pissed me off. Pixar/Disney cartoons/CGI flicks I love.

You guys mention Neeson.. Taken is my favorite movie with him, by far.

But, unlike you snobbish snobs (LOL), I can definitely turn my brain off and just be entertained. To me, that's what movies/films are for. Not to think so much that my eyes hurt. I tend to go into a movie with very low expectations, and most of the time I'm blown away (with the exception of the Twilight movies.. New Moon was the better of the two.. but I can't stand the main two actors).
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
zombieslayer
15 years ago
I enjoyed Taken.

See this is the thing - Taken had some well executed plot devices. The average movie doesn't do that. Plus Neeson looks like a genuine bad ass, not some one dimensional cartoon hero. Neeson has it, kind of like Clint Eastwood has it. Gran Tarino was a damn fine movie and old man Clint still looked like he could beat down some punk in his 20s. Neeson to me is like Clint lite. He still needs to make that great movie to put him up there with Clint, but I really think he'll be there someday.

Dreamworks I don't really care for but Pixar is da bomb. Loved Toy Story 2, Ratatouille, and Up and liked pretty much every other movie they've ever made.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago

Zero.. you're a dick! LOL

I love cartoons. Pixar/Dreamworks.. I don't care. I tend to love them. Well, most of them. Robots pissed me off. Pixar/Disney cartoons/CGI flicks I love.

You guys mention Neeson.. Taken is my favorite movie with him, by far.

But, unlike you snobbish snobs (LOL), I can definitely turn my brain off and just be entertained. To me, that's what movies/films are for. Not to think so much that my eyes hurt. I tend to go into a movie with very low expectations, and most of the time I'm blown away (with the exception of the Twilight movies.. New Moon was the better of the two.. but I can't stand the main two actors).

"Formo" wrote:



I liked Taken, too. For all the reasons given.

I tend to go along the "be entertained line". Heck, I like everything from Cheech and Chong to Steven Seagal.

My movie skeleton in the closet: I actually saw "Unmarried Woman" (Jill Clayburgh) three times. Barf. Once by myself; once because the group I was hanging out with at the time went and I didn't have a car to the "after movie place." And a third time -- well, I was hoping for something from another unmarried woman. Justice was done that night, however: I went home alone.

About the only actor I won't watch is Meryl Streep. I've never forgiven her for Kramer v Kramer (double quadruple barf). And all of the rest of her sanctimonious characters. I almost never go to Dustin Hoffman movies either, for the same reason, but he gets a bit of slack for not completely effing up one of the greatest "older woman" movies ever made (The Graduate, for you youngsters).

Mr. McGuire: I want to say one word to you. Just one word.
Benjamin: Yes, sir.
Mr. McGuire: Are you listening?
Benjamin: Yes, I am.
Mr. McGuire: Plastics.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (11h) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
    dfosterf (11h) : a lower back injury
    dfosterf (11h) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
    beast (20h) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
    packerfanoutwest (23h) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
    dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
    Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
    Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
    beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
    beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
    buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
    wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
    beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
    Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
    TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
    beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
    Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
    wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
    Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    12-Aug / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    11-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    11-Aug / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    11-Aug / Around The NFL / packerfanoutwest

    10-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / buckeyepackfan

    10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    10-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.