bboystyle
13 years ago

I'll just say this: I would not be surprised if many heterosexual men think of Aaron Rodgers while making love to their partner(s).

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:




in a similar way,the other day i was making love to my girl and they showed the highlights of the Packers/Colts game and i couldnt help but stop for a few seconds to see Rodgers highlights of that game...My girl got pissed and shoved me off her which was fine by me cuz now i can have all my attention on chico and his god like presence on my tv...
bboystyle
13 years ago
Right now,Rodgers is the most clutch QB in the league which is why people would take him over manning,brady,ect...He's ungodly on the hardest down in football(3rd),it doesnt get more clutch then that...Last years playoff game was just a sample for Rodgers...Now hat he has been there,he will conquer!
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
RedSoxExcel
13 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Wow, based on?
blank
longtimefan
13 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Wow, based on?

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



His opinion?
DakotaT
13 years ago



Either way I don't care about the Pats, but Brady has nothing to do with any of that. At the end of the day, I think its very hard to argue that Brady is not VERY VERY good.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:




Sorry I bunked out of this. Brady is good and has been given all the accolades he needs ad nauseum.

I throw Brady into my systems quarterbacks category with Montana and Young.

Then you have the gunslingers like Marino, Elway, and Favre.

Then you have the highbred guys like Manning and Rodgers.

These are great arguments, but just arguing that one player has rings versus other guys cheapens the argument because some of those guys played on stacked teams, and others had to elevate their game just to get their team to the playoffs. Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson won super bowls, so much for that criteria.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Even a casual glance at Favre's performances in the playoffs the past decade and a half could lead one to the reasoned conclusion that the Packers could conceivably have won more titles had it not been for the repeated meltdowns of their quarterback at the most inopportune times.

Favre is probably the third best regular season quarterback of all time, after Manning and Marino. A great postseason quarterback he is not and never has been. Every time I re-watch the Super Bowl XXXI, it becomes more obvious to me that the Packers won that night not because of Favre's play but because Holmgren kept Favre firmly leashed.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
13 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Wow, based on?

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:




While I think it's impossible to quantify such a statement, one can't say his opinion is anymore false than your possible counter to it. It's just an opinion. None of us really know.
RedSoxExcel
13 years ago

Even a casual glance at Favre's performances in the playoffs the past decade and a half could lead one to the reasoned conclusion that the Packers could conceivably have won more titles had it not been for the repeated meltdowns of their quarterback at the most inopportune times.

Favre is probably the third best regular season quarterback of all time, after Manning and Marino. A great postseason quarterback he is not and never has been. Every time I re-watch the Super Bowl XXXI, it becomes more obvious to me that the Packers won that night not because of Favre's play but because Holmgren kept Favre firmly leashed.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Edit, before you pick on my choice of words, I do not mean that you are necessarily one of these "people" mentioned below.

I love how some how people only look at one of side of the coin on the whole Favre playoffs thing.

What if we had a defense that could stop a 4th and 27 against the Eagles?! 4th and 27! Not 4th and 15, not 4th and 20, a 4th and 27. Don't you think we would have likely won that game if we had stopped a 4th and 27.

What about Super Bowl XXXII. Favre threw 3 TDs but the Packers D allowed 157 yards and 3 TDs down to TD. Don't tyou think that we would have likely won that game if we could stop TD?

What about the 49ers-Packers game where Favre gave the Packers the lead with like a minute something left. And some how our defense gave up a horrible drive that ended with Young to TO? I'm pretty sure we would have won that if it wasn't for the D.

Or even the Falcons-Packers game, people keep blaming Favre for it. Favre was a BIG part of the problem but VICK, yes VICK DESTROYED the Packers D, we were NOT winning a SB that year with that D. But people only have selective memories or they never watched those games and look at box scores. Even go to the play by play on NFL.com for that game and you'll see how much Vick destroyed that D.

It goes both ways, Favre blew really good SB possibilities (the Giants-Packers 2007 game) but there were SB yeras were Favre was fine and others blew it. Namely, Super Bowl XXXII and the 49ers-Packers game. I really feel people over-state how good Packers teams were.

Just like Rodgers, yeah it sucks we lost that game against the Cardinals on that play where Rodgers missed Jennings in OT but in the grand scheme, we were NOT winning a SB with that defense.
blank
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
the 49ers game we had won, Rice fumbled, stop mentioning that game, we don't need that pain brought up!
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (15m) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
    Mucky Tundra (1h) : damn those vikings
    beast (1h) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
    beast (2h) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
    beast (2h) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
    beast (2h) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
    TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
    dhazer (9h) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
    TheKanataThrilla (9h) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
    dhazer (9h) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
    Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
    Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
    beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
    Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
    Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
    beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
    beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
    TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
    Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
    Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
    TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
    TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
    Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
    Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
    dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
    dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
    beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
    Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
    wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
    Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
    Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
    Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
    Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
    Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

    17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.